T14 1L. Applied to big texas firms on 12/1. I was asked to come to the office for a callback interview later this month at one of the top Texas firms. My question is how much do grades matter at this point if they already extended the callback interview to me?
They matter. I don’t think it’s like 2L OCI where a CB (generally) means you’ve already cleared the grades hurdle.
For a data point: I know someone who interviewed around the same time for a 1L SA last year. Didn’t hear anything for a few weeks, sent the firm his/her fall grades (which were stellar), offer next day.
And on the flip side, I know people who got SAs before grades. It all depends.
Since you’re anon, could you post the firm?
different anon here but I received a screener request from Baker Botts today
congrats dude, anyone hear back from other markets early?
Also got Baker Botts interview.
I’m OOS at UT. Does anyone know if it matters if I can’t make it to Dallas in person? I’ll get a flight after finals if it would hurt my chances to do it via Skype instead, but otherwise it’s more convenient to do the Skype interview.
Also, anybody have any insight as to what kind of grades would be needed for Baker Botts? This is making me even more anxious about finals…eek
Very good normally (think 2L OCI) but I don’t know how this changes for 1L callback before you have grades.
Different anon, have gotten Baker Botts, King & Spalding, and Jackson Walker. Any idea on callback to offer ratio for Texas 1L SAs?
No idea, but my advice is to 1) focus on your finals and 2) do a practice interview or two. You are playing with house money.
This is usually at T6 schools where diversity is sufficient or the firm is not grade-selective at the school in 2L recruiting anyway.
True story
Lots of DC rejections but no positive movement
rejection from Orrick
True, although I noticed that very strong pre law school work experience was also a big factor, with investment banking having the most weight. According to my T6 career office, K-JDs like myself were unfortunately more out of luck at this stage of the process. Once grades come back, though, I would strongly encourage K-JDs to apply.
Anecdotal, but from what I hear this is also true of IP types with strong engineering/technical creds. Apparently they care more about your technical background than how much you know about Torts and Property. Still probably varies some.
I’m at Berkeley and last year the people with hard science/eng/computer science backgrounds absolutely cleaned up for IP SA positions. Before grades came out. Same with the URMs (although less so–some had to wait for grades, some did not).
I’m an IP applicant from MVPB, haven’t received anything from DC firms yet, FWIW.
Funny thing is I don’t qualify as any of these things lol. I’m a K-JD. Kind of wondering why on Earth I got selected for such an early interview (I’m certainly happy about it though!)
One of my friends got it, I’m pretty sure, b/c he listed Golf as one of his favorite hobbies.