DF Thread

http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-forgive-at-least-108-billion-in-student-debt-in-coming-years-1480501802

Check you PiLf

angry boomers with pitchforks in the comments section who don’t understand that there are real reasons people go to more expensive/prestigious schools (i.e. to have a chance at actually getting a job), not to brag at parties

Seriously. The comments sections are always filled with stories of boomers saying they worked during college to pay for it, and act like millennials are just super lazy and don’t work during school. Today, even working full time during school is not enough to pay for undergrad, let alone law school.

just do pay 50k in tuition + 15-20 k in living expenses per year by working a part-time minimum wage job. Even many good in-state schools for UG like the UCs in-state cost of attendance is listed at ~35k a year, so ~150k over four years assuming you don’t get screwed on registration. Also, many/most good jobs are effectively inaccessible to people who don’t go to good/great schools, both at the UG and grad levels. https://www.admission.ucla.edu/prospect/budget.htm

Back in my day, we created untenable financial crises for the following generation that we would subsequently blame on their perceived laziness. But do you hear us complaining?

Foxy’s just jealous no one intends to forgive his $300+k debt (or whatever it’s at by now).

Mad jealous

I’d be cool with making the school that received the money from the student the federal government lent to being put on the hook for the amount of forgiveness.

Shots fired.

Future refiers might not even be safe.

lol at conflating doctors and lawyers

schools have needed skin in the game forever, beyond stupid that we’ve allowed this incentive structure in higher ed

one of the primary lessons of the financial crash is that you can’t let the people who originate loans dump off all the risk

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2016/11/30/its-going-to-cost-taxpayers-108-billion-to-help-student-loan-borrowers/?utm_term=.275691e119ff

It seems more of an attack on the Department of Education than the programs itself. This seems important:

Enzi said at the very least there needs to be greater transparency in the way education officials calculate costs, but his office said he is not calling for any major changes to the repayment plans at the moment.

I can’t see a scenario where PAYE and PSLF goes away for current borrowers. Even Obama’s PSLF cap only applied to new borrowers.

Maybe WSJ needs to write a piece on why doctors and lawyers who would presumably not need the help actually seriously do :unamused: lol

Lol. “Even” Obama’s plan??? That would be BEST case scenario not worst. We’re in worst territory.

Because of Trump? He’s actually proposed a better income-based plan.

Removed post…