Michigan vs Berkeley
- Michigan
- Berkeley
Each acceptance letter that has come in over the last month has worked to raise both my level of elation at having got into some great schools and stress over where I want to spend the next three years studying law. I applied to over ten schools because I was open to any possibilities. So far I have been accepted to Michigan, Georgetown, Berkeley, UCLA, and Texas-Austin. A variety of factors are making the decision tough for me. I don’t necessarily know what kind of law I want to practice, I’m originally from Michigan and this is where my family lives, due to health issues I have during the winter, I detest the cold and therefore am strongly biased towards warmer climates, and, finally, I don’t know where I want to settle down after law school and I don’t want to rule out NYC, DC, or California.
In terms of what type of law interest me, I wrote about international law in my personal statement. I know I know, the amount of lawyers who practice “international law” is minuscule compared to everyone who originally wants to go to into it. However, my undergrad major was in International Affairs, I have spent the last ten years studying foreign language, and I have a coauthor role in a text book revolving around international conflict. I can not help the fact that I am interested in Foreign Policy and being that I could think of no other area that interested me other than public interest, I appealed to what I knew. I realize I will know more of what I want after my first year. That being said, if I had to select a dream job it’d be somewhere in the field of international law in the government or public sector. Again, this does not mean I’m totally opposed to a position at a big law firm if the opportunity presented itself because I know the money will be appealing.
In the end I think I want the school that is going to give me the most options and opportunities though I’m slightly skewed towards international law. I understand Berkeley has the higher ranking but I have thus far been unable to find any characteristic that makes it the better school. Do you know of one? I have heard that Michigan is the most national school and sends their graduates to the most diverse amount of cities whereas the majority of Berkeley grads stay in California, but is that just because there is no job market in Michigan and California is, well, California? I have also seen varying reports on which school is more prestigious in international law so I see no clear cut winner there either. I am also attracted to the culture at both schools which seem to be similar in a lot of ways.
Instead of rambling on anymore about my complete indecisiveness I will turn the floor over to anyone who can offer some level of insight regarding what they would do in this situation or better yet what they did.
Help me please!
P.S. I am awaiting decisions from Harvard, Yale, and Stanford and was wait-listed at Columbia. I’m not really banking on getting into any of these schools but if I were to get into Harvard or Yale I think my choice would be a little clearer. I had originally put Columbia above Berkeley because I love NYC and they are a clear leader in international law, but what about Stanford vs Berkeley?!