I just found out that some (admittedly, lower ranked) schools apparently don’t let 1Ls use outlines on exams! I am shocked because all of my law school friends have been able to take outlines into exams. Does anyone have a breakdown on which schools do and don’t permit outlines? Are open notes tests the norm?
Also: legal writing: graded or ungraded at most schools?
Mostly this. Out of all my 1L exams, I only opened my outline once, and that was in contracts.
I go to a T30, and except for 2 classes, all of mine are open book. The one prof is very traditional and the other is going off the basis of “the bar isn’t open book, so my exam won’t be either.” But for the most part, open-book is allowed, with some profs limiting what you can bring in (e.g. self-created vs. commercial material)
IMO, not this. I had an open book professor who basically said the same thing: you can bring everything, but nothing will help you. I can guarantee you that I used the book/my notes to correctly answer at least 10 multiple choice questions, and write my essays. I sincerely don’t understand how people keep saying that outlines are useless. It seems to me that:
(a) You effectively have everything that you will need to know memorized.
(b) You have no idea how to look stuff up efficiently.
Multiple choice is a totally different ball game. All my exams have been essay, and when you have 3 two-page long fact patterns to answer in 3 hours, you don’t have time to go through an outline.
This is quite true with the exception of Civil Procedure. when you’re looking up the exact number of a FRCP and you can’t quite remember if it’s subsection (a) or (d) or some other inanity needed for the exam, having a quickly ctrl+f-able outline makes it much much better.
Only on one closed book exam. On CivPro it was open book, open note, open internet but proctored. Contracts was a 5 hour take-home (though that sucked for me because my laptop froze up about two hours in, had to rush to IT Dept and lost like 30-45 minutes).
This semester though, we have a closed book hand written; one half closed book, half open; and then another straight open book.
All of my 1st semester exams were open book; 2 of my 3 in second semester are closed book.
To provide a bit of a counterpoint, I actually found myself looking at my outline/actually looking through casebooks more than I wanted to or should have, especially in Torts. And I don’t think it really hurt, in that the negatives of losing maybe 8 total minutes (for me, that’s about 350 words) were largely balanced out by how much more comfortable I felt being knowing I could look at all of that stuff if I needed it. I mean to say, a couple minutes every hour to make sure I knew what I was talking about was worth it for me. At the beginning of the third hour of each exam I took a deep breath, sat back in my chair, and closed my eyes/kind of just glanced about for a few minutes.
I mean, ideally, you’ll be at the point where you’re equally comfortable with and without written material, because you’ll have everything you could have possibly written in an outline memorized cold. But if that’s not the case, I wouldn’t automatically dismiss the whole comfort-level type thing. For what it’s worth, even though I usually do pretty well on them, I really freak out about tests (I mean, teeth grinding, pacing, hyperventilating, almost shaking in the 30 minutes before a really important exam), so I’m probably pretty atypical when it comes to the value I place on the whole fallback/comfort level thing. But if you’re like me, it is possible to rely more heavily on that stuff - if only as a bit of a check - and still do pretty well.
NU allows computer outlines (find is glorious). There are some prohibitions depending on profs (e.g. no copy/paste). We don’t have any exam software, just the honor code.
That’s how ours is, too. I looked at my outlines during the exams, though I mostly focused on my shorter/attack outline. Control + F is amazing for exams <3