…
I set it up with the bicycles as the base.
| | | |
B B B B
But looking back a better setup might have been
1 ____ _____ _____ _____
2 ____ _____ _____ _____
B B B B
Lol, idk how anyone can remember. Test is a blur
Probably a good sign if the test is a blur!
I think you’re asking about the 3rd game on PT64. We posted a diagram and some question explanations: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/forums/preptest-64-october-2011-lsat-answers-explanations-lg-f935.html?sid=7df3ce5015c1893bc2fd18d475af38fd
I hope that’s helpful.
I don’t really remember, but I think I did:
_ 1 2
B _ _
B _ _
B _ _
B _ _
and then drew the rules to the left of the Bicycle variables.
This looks really familiar, I probably did this as well
This.
It was a very easy game if you had it set up this way.
I didn’t take October, but I would have set it up like Noah did. Seems like an easy setup?
I had it set up, wasn’t easy for me on test day lol
I did:
d1 ___ ___ ___ ___ Rules
d2 ___ ___ ___ ___
I got all but 18 and 13 right, so not perfect, but compared with many, I did pretty decently on the bicycle game.
Yeah this is how I set it up, and I got -0 on LG. Honestly, I thought the ambassador game was harder, and the shelf game was about the same difficulty (and whatever the first game was was easy).
I think the main deduction was that Yuki1 Seamus2 had to be for F or G. After that, things were pretty clear
I did this, and didn’t miss any.
I had it set up like this:
B B B B
1 __ __ __ __
2 __ __ __ __
And I got perfect on the game and found it pretty easy
ITT: C&F FAIL.
:…
You agreed not to:
on the legal-y stuff you signed during the test. Just sayin’…
Are you kidding me? We’re allowed to talk about the game generally, we just cant copy the exact wording of the question or answer choices. No one here was violating LSAC’s copyrights. LOL.