VETO UW

VETO UW

  • YES VETO
  • NO VETO (I love paying money to UW)
0 voters

UW has chosen to take a stance that since its school is “so affordable” that there is no need for scholarship offers for many of its students.

Given the current economic climate and employment prospect I respectfully disagree.

So, here is my response to UW: thanks but not thanks.

Who is going to join me?

I’M VETOING HARVARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE TAKEN THE POSITION THAT I’M NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO GET IN

Awesome…You hear that Harvard: YOU ARE OUT…You have been VETOED!

+1

I’m vetoing this thread, justathought21, and also Harvard for not letting me in. :wink:

Awesome, but the great thing about the thread and me, is that we were not going to place the proverbial Golden Handcuffs on ya!
So, thread, justathought21, and Harvard…YOU have been VETOED!

Can I veto Penn while we’re at it, for waitlisting me like a little bitch?

I have a couple of schools on my veto-waitlist. You should create one.

Yeah, they should have tailored that email to in state applicants only.

This is your thread for discussing this issue. Do not start another thread on the topic or you will be banned.

+1 hahahah

..

If this is a troll attempt, this is spectacular.

If this is not a troll attempt, 145.

If you don’t want to go to UW, great. I’ll gladly take your spot off of the waitlist.

A veto – Latin for “I forbid”…used in a sentence: UW “I forbid” you to place Golden Handcuffs on me…aka: UW, YOU have been VETOED :smiley:

Hi, I’m the word boycott, have we met?

Unless you mean “veto” as in, “I will veto your next thread if you make another one on this subject.”

Epic thread is epic. I vote Veto. Too cool for school obviously.

I’m just glad justathought21 learned that it’s veto, not vetoe…